First horseless carriage in Vancouver (1899)
"Can't get there from here" is the punch line of an old joke about a driver asking a farmer for directions (my father used to tell it, with great effect, using a thick New England accent). There is, in linguistic circles, a question of whether or not there are certain ideas that can't be conceived of without the language needed to describe them, having been developed in advance. Call it a cognitive chicken-and-egg,
can't get there from here, conundrum. As I began thinking about what city life might be like in the year 2050, I found myself wondering how people will speak of robots when
everything is a robot. Just as we no longer refer to "horseless carriages," I don't expect anyone to refer to "driverless automobiles" forty years from now. Rather than invent a new word (carbot? cardroid?) or repurpose an old one (
automat?
autobot?) I decided instead that it made more sense to invent a new
way of speaking; to have English speakers use tone to change meaning: so a driverless car became a ca
R, a robotic carpenter became a carpente
R, and an automated operator - like the kind we interact with more and more today - became an operato
R. What ended up happening is that my mind went in an entirely unexpected direction. Instead of thinking about questions of
Artificial Intelligence, I found myself wondering about
Artificial Labor. The difference is subtle but turned out to be helpful making the leap past the naysaying Yankee.